Posts Tagged ‘ imaginative ’

die antwoord.

haroshi.

i saw the exquisite work of Haroshi last night. He was in the house of Huf, which wound up as a crazy party. It’s cool to see that this kind of creativity still exists in a tangible way. This artist takes old skateboards and spins them into amazing pieces of art. check out more pieces here.

toast.

I thought this was pretty impressive. Or maybe I was impressed cause it was pretty.

bear trap.


what’s there not to like about this? (Besides the price…)

2050.

i love these things.

devil whale.


creator of this moby dick-esque piece is Jen Lobo. curators are found here.

tree of life.

for me, this film read like a symphony. Or maybe an art installation. It was life-enriching and it was boring, a little bit of both and that’s okay. I think Terence Malick, after all I’ve heard about the history of the filmmaking of this movie, knew exactly what he wanted and certainly achieved it. When you sit down to watch this film you have to be prepared to just sit. It’s worth it, for all intents and purposes, it’s obviously Malick’s masterpiece and it’s respectable. I love the idea of a filmmaker doing what he wants and getting away with it. Of course, I only love it when applies to actual, real-deal filmmakers. Malick’s dissertation is filled with beautiful cinematography arranged against a harmonious soundtrack. With as little dialogue that is involved, the performances were still quite powerful. Sure I sat there and laughed a little bit at the overly dramatic moments, especially any scenes that featured hands… I thought that was a little much but I understood what he was doing. Also, I had a problem with Brad Pitt’s character. When all is said and done, he wasn’t that bad of a father or husband so why is the young Sean Penn character so angry? Maybe cause he was becoming an adolescent? Overall, the children in the film is what blew me away the most. I’m used to great work by Brad Pitt and Sean Penn, and even Jessica Chastain wasn’t that bad though she did irk me from time to time. The kids is where it’s at. They should be nominated for their performances. I am always fascinated when babies act and it comes across so real and powerful. lastly, I really liked the movie, I didn’t fall in love with it, but I could really use it to go to bed (that sounds like an insult but it honestly isn’t) or maybe keep watching it to extract more of what Terence was trying to say…

super 8.

you will feel like a kid again. reminiscent of Close Encounters of a Third Kind, E.T, Stand by Me and War of the Worlds, J.J Abrams latest fits in- nice and snug within its likened predecessors. I honestly did not know what to expect when sitting down for this movie but that was to be expected since the plot was a closely guarded secret. Even if I didn’t know what to exactly expect it doesn’t mean I didn’t have high no-expectations, cause I did and that’s never a good thing. I’ve said before that my MO when watching TV/Film is usually to go in with wanting nothing and in return I get more out of it than I would if I set some sort of unreachable bar, sometimes… In any case, being a big Abrams fan, I wanted something amazing to prove that those adventurous coming-of-age kids stories are not a thing of the past. I don’t even like saying it but I think this film was mostly fine and enjoyable. It wasn’t the best but then again if I saw it when I was young I know I would’ve been super stoked. When you’re a kid you think about how awesome it would be if an invasion really happened to your hometown or one hopes to stumble upon some type of conspiratorial mystery that needs solving by some juveniles. When I was watching Super 8, I got distracted by the dialogue, though the banter was witty and funny at times, I felt like it was a smidge too much. But with that said, you can always count on Spielberg to deliver some great kid actors. The movie hung on the shoulders of these kids who comprised the main members of the cast, and the choices were great and felt era-appropriate. I loved that the kids were making a movie and were determined to go to all lengths to make it happen. As per usual, Abrams loves his visual effects and they were truly great but I think he went a little heavy on the lens flares. Also to be expected is a great soundtrack, score and sound design. The 80s backdrop was really accentuated by sing-alongable pop songs of the era. I will always be a fan of Michael Giacchino (who even makes an appearance) who did a wonderful job scoring this film for its impending doom moments and eerie mood swings. The sound effects were pretty amazing, from the spectacular train wreck to the creatures roars, which sound awfully like something from Jurassic Park, hmm…

overall, i approve this film and I wished it had a little more oomph, but I’ll take what I can get. This is the kind of movie that makes you want to make movies.

found: a star wars inspiration.

these steampunk-esque masks look something familiar… Could this be where George Lucas might have looked for a little inspiration for Darth Vadar and C-3PO’s costumes? Having German and Parisian roots, these smoke helmets were worn by firefighters in the 1800s. Hmm… Seems pretty likely or else too uncanny.

black swan.

it was unexpected. It was good. The cinematography (Matthew Libatique) was beautifully intrusive and the score (Clint Mansell) was gravely haunting. I’m a fan of Vincent Cassel (played Thomas Leroy). He reminds me of one of the old greats and will definitely have a long-standing career. He is seductive and captivating at every moment he is on screen. Mila Kunis (played Lily) did a great job as well. I’ve never seen her extend past the the comedy circuit so it was good to see her expand herself into this thriller-genre. Natalie Portman (played Nina Sayers) did well but I didn’t feel like she pushed to her absolute limits. Portman will most likely get nominated for this role solely due to the fact that it’s a Darren Aronofsky film. Aronofsky did a pretty fantastic job of sewing together a pretty complex group of characters with a deeply psychological story (written by Mark Heyman and Andres Heinz). As per his M.O, Aronofsky makes the audience feel uncomfortable and quite paranoid the entire time. Immediately I was intrigued by the mother-daughter relationship between Nina Sayers and her mother Erica (played by Barbara Hershey). We open to a very princess-like bedroom, belonging to Portman’s character and Hershey’s character helping her daughter as if she cannot take care of herself. Between Nina constantly calling her mother “mommy” and the various instances of her trying to appease her mother and not being able to make her own decisions, I knew that this relationship was the thread that would unravel Natalie’s character in the end. At the very moment we saw the dolls and various pink frills of Nina’s room, Ashley turns to me and says, “This room will be destroyed.” She was right. But not only was the room physically destroyed but so were the many walls that were built inside this character. I loved the various places the character was taken, from first-time experiences with drug use and masturbation to garnering the lead role in “Swan Lake” and the pressures that come along with not only such a heavy responsibility but also realizing a dream goal finally met. I usually like anything to do with the human psyche and how it’s power can affect the way a character acts, thinks and feels. This film definitely was loaded with so much of this kind of drama that it made me feel anxious and on edge the entire time. I found that I related to Nina’s slow downward spiral and then being disturbed that I related to any of it at all.
I’m not sure what the message of the film was or if there was even supposed to be one at all but the end scene was quite commanding especially with the climax of Nina’s ever-obsession with perfection.